hmmmm ..... is there a differance in what Bible you use?

Your exactly right!

		Quote:			Posted by {author}
	ceolmaer   Foil Activity 0%   Posts: 4 Referrals: 0 0.00 Gold View Inventory        hmmmm ..... is there a differance in what Bible you use? « on: April 06, 2010, 03:53:06 PM »      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I believe there is. Where the NIV seems to make the Bible easier to understand it also changes the meaning of certian verses. Even the new KJV is differnt. I like the older ones, Prior to 1960. Of course I have a Scofield Bible. Am I wrong, please explain. Linkback: You are not allowed to view links. Please Register or Login http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,13246.msg83711.html#msg83711

In fact, the AV 1611 King James is the true word of God, preserved & uncorrupted unlike all other versions.

The AV 1611 is the very same word of God as the original textus receptus, the Greek & Hebrew text purified 7 times.

Consider as you mentioned,
all other version's or actually perversions as they are have taken Gods word out of context, changed and omitted doctrine and salvation text, and so on & so forth. So therefore, of what value is a corrupted text to have or use considering these most important facts then?
What because they are easier to read or understand?...I shall say not, as the word of God is God himself, as he says it is.
(In the Beginning was the Word, the Word was with God & the Word was God)

God actually puts his word above his Holy Name!
For anyone to change & take away and or add to it, the Book of Revelation says those men such as (wescott & hort) and all other preverters of his word have no hope or salvation and the wrath of God abideth on them.

I suggest anyone wishing to see an most important truth of salvation and a public profession of faith read the story of Philip & the eunuch.....

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

Read the truth & then read what it states in your version & see the central difference and truth, that he made a statement of belief and acceptance before he was Baptised, that is salvation & that's what the true word of God states. (ll the other versions omit this bedrock doctrine & statement of central faith)

All the perversions or corrupt versions have removed the public profession of faith saying the he believed that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and died and rose for our sins & the central salvation doctrinal acceptance of this. (Where as, the AV1611 is without any error)

That's all I'll say on this topic for now, and I know there are those who will take offense and those who know and agree, but as its true that arguments and discourse usually follow these talks and over the internet isn't the best place to have meaningful fruitful discussions, but none the less I'll take a stand for the true Word of God here or there at all times regardless of the outcomes!
I merely care enough about you all to give you what I know to be the truth, so please understand that I'm your friend and I care about you all.

These articles and video will sum up the truth pretty well about all versions and text after the AV1611:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

and this video:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

and this article:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

God says the scripture is foolishness to them that are not saved and born again or for the non believer.although the central teachings are easy to understand for our lost souls to read, see and realize we need to be Born Again according to the scriptures.

Regards & best wishes to all, as in the Spirit I'm trying to just give the truth & help anyone searching for the truth.

Jim

Linkback:

You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login

http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,13246.msg227562.html#msg227562