Homefire wrote:
| | Quote: | | | Posted by {author} | | | |
| Signal injection via two box can be effective on ore bodies too but not going to work on this type target.
| |
| | |
This one agrees with this especially with a cheep retail grade of "Two box detector" compared to government grade of "Two box detector" that can go down to up to 100 feet with many times the watts of signal power used. Very big cost as well.
This one is just asking if there is any benefit to using two of the same type of metal detectors on just one long intended target? One coil is 'Scrubed or touching' one end of the intended target and the other coil is 'Scanned' down the line of the intended target.
The learning curve could be really long and painful to check this out?
Posted on: April 17, 2017, 09:27:55 pm
Hello
Has anyone tried two Falcon detector coils on a wood stick say 5 inches apart to probe at twice the speed a large flat plastic pan of pebbles or along the same mineral zone out in the feild? The noise may get real bad with both detectors singing at the same time?
No 'Pain no Gain'.....LOL
Posted on: April 17, 2017, 09:52:07 pm
Hello
Has anyone used a panto graph (4 bar point or pivot point type) to hold a sample test rock with one small metal detector coil under and the other metal detector coil above not inline of each other to 'Scan one side of the rock at a time as the panto graph is moved back and forth?
This could be done with a plastic pan of test pebbles and
two Falcon metal detector probe coils not much detecting range of about 5/8 inch range on each of the two coils maybe? Still this would double the effective detecting depth on the pebbles one at a time.
Linkback: You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login
http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,65194.msg318241.html#msg318241
|
|
Logged
|
|