Christian, thanks for posting, but I thought you were going to present some type of Scientific proof why the LRL products I Build, sell, and use myself, did not work?
The model Pro-4. is my popular seller and it does every thing I claim it does, and it also has the limitations I claim it does which is always clearly stated when I speak to an interested customer. The PRO-4 has a 1 year warranty which is copied from White's electronics, so it has the same limited warranty as a Metal detector.
The Geotech, link you provided has little validity other than it is written well, and sounds good, since the product pictured is NOT of my manufacture, and Leaders of the Skeptic Group James Randi, and Carl Morland, lied through their teeth when they falsely published that this was the product that Randi, tested in 1987. It was not, and that has been proved to be an outrageous lie.
For years the Skeptic group have publicly dishonored the truth, and made a mockery of Science, in their unscrupulous efforts to slander, discredit, and silence my voice on public forums.
Yes, I totally agree that LRL's do not, and cannot work according to the theories of operation falsely promoted by Carl Morland, and the Skeptic group. It doesn't take a Rocket Scientist to understand that their analytical skills are lacking and LRL's can not possibly operate according to their assumption. That is not to say that they don't work within the known laws of Physics.
As far as the so called Challenges, they are exactly that, and nothing more. They provide no credible proof that LRL's don't work in the manner That I claim they do. I know that my own products could never pass the challenge, yet they serve as a time & money saving tool in mine, and others search for shipwrecks and hidden treasure
 |  | Quote: |  | | Posted by {author} | | |  |
 | By the way, I will soon start selling Long Range Locators myself and tell all potential customers that I do NOT think they actually work but that I gurantee they will work at least as good as any other long range locator on the market while they will only cost a fraction of the other machines out there. This way I hope can atleast limit the loss of the customers to some degree. Still everybody is free to believe in what they wish to ... even if it is a Long Range Locator |  |
 | |  |
Christian, I am glad to hear this. At one time Carl Moreland, was going to build LRL and give them away FREE. I liked the idea and offered to contribute to the shipping costs, and then he reneged. It was an opportunity lost.
If you wish for me to test your product under Central Florida, USA operating conditions, I will freely do so and give you an unbiased report on it's benefits, and limitations. I would be happy to see the rip off priced LRL's manufactured by EE's and techs, put out of business. I'm with you. Dell
Linkback: You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login
http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,21680.msg149268.html#msg149268
|
« Last Edit: February 27, 2011, 05:34:06 pm by Dell_Winders »
|
Logged
|
"WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE"
|
