OK Christian, here it is.
A question put to 1973 Nobel Peace Prize winner for physics, Professor Brian Josephson of Cambridge.? Is it a realistic question that man might be a thought-form in a universe that was made of thought?? His answer was, ?It has been suggested by some people that the universe is made of thought. The scientist says everything is made up out of fields. It?s somewhat parallel that a field might be a thought and then you could arrive at the conclusion that everything is made of thought. Certainly things are not made up out of particles, so I think to show it was made up of thought, you?d need to show that something like a thought process was going on, and we really don?t have that picture yet. But we do have some sense that observation might help to construct reality, and that comes close to the idea that thought is involved in the nature of reality.?
A thought is energy that causes neurons in the brain to fire in certain patterns. That firing produces tiny currents along definite paths in the brain cortex that can be picked up with sensitive instruments through electrodes on the surface of the skull. This thought that starts out very tiny, will or can develop into a full blown thought producing at least a 70 millivolt potential somewhere in the cortex. It fires the first neuron, which in turn causes others to fire in a certain sequence. In this universe, no energy is lost. If we can pick up the current produced by the thought outside of the head, it means that the energy of that thought was sent in the form of electromagnetic waves, and at the velocity of light into the environment. Since energy can?t be destroyed, that thought remains in the universe, and might or might not impinge on someone or something for whom it was created.
I would like to share some interesting facts about the phenomena surrounding the system.(Psi Tracker) As most who have followed my progress know, we are using an entirely electronic system that was developed to show metered responses to brain activity when engaged in searching for targets .
Some of the first tests were performed using a single blind procedure, these were tried just to see if we could electronically obtain signals from the Psi Tracker. Some observers noted that the receiver, who was holding the instrument, could have been mentally receiving the location of the targets from the mind of the sender who knew the targets? position. I agree this is most likely the case. However, it is more amazing that the Psi Tracker can register a human thought that has been passed between two individuals.
Only mental processes are used in the searches, this is not a dowsing instrument or method.
Another fact that seems to back up the findings of James Spottiswoodes is that we have noted that at certain peaks of solar activity, there will be no response from the Psi Tracker.
The operator or receiver is electronically connected to the Psi Tracker, which then begins to monitor brain activity. The sender after concentrating on a target, NOT WHERE THE TARGET IS, allows enough time for the thought to become full blown. Somehow, the thought creates a line to the target, which we believe is electrical or telluric in nature, and creates a small electromagnetic field around the target signal line. The operator when entering the field of the signal line is somehow able to mentally detect the line, and the Psi Tracker monitors that detection and registers on an analogue and/or digital meter. After the operator has passed the location of the target, the Psi tracker will not register any brain activity above or below the normal threshold.
Almost all of the tests were controlled in that the sender knew where the target was located. Later field experiments were conducted where neither sender nor receiver knew the whereabouts of targets or even if there were any. The Psi Tracker proved to us that indeed it could locate an unknown target. However, many, many more tests need to be performed before I am satisfied that random chance is not involved.
Since we are full time treasure hunters and prospectors, we don?t always have the time for field testing. People have asked me why I don?t patent the unit, and my answer is that I don?t believe that you can patent an esoteric idea. But anyway, it is great fun to experiment with.
I guess I am ready for questions.
Bill
Linkback: You are not allowed to view links.
Please Register or Login
http://www.thunting.com/smf/index.php/topic,387.msg1880.html#msg1880
There are 1 attachment(s) in this post which you can not view or downloadPlease register for viewing them. Psi Tracker.jpg
|
|
Logged
|
Him thief him friend of him last Guinea
Him kill both priest and friar, oh dear.
Him cut de t'roat of piccaninny
Bloody, bloody buccaneer!
|
